Advertisement
Original Research| Volume 5, ISSUE 3, 100845, March 2023

Late preterm delivery has a distinctive second-stage duration and characteristics

  • Ola Gutzeit
    Affiliations
    Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (Drs Gutzeit, Justman, Ben Zvi, Siegler, Khatib, Ginsberg, Beloosesky, Weiner, Vitner, Liberman, and Zipori)
    Search for articles by this author
  • Naphtali Justman
    Affiliations
    Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (Drs Gutzeit, Justman, Ben Zvi, Siegler, Khatib, Ginsberg, Beloosesky, Weiner, Vitner, Liberman, and Zipori)
    Search for articles by this author
  • Dikla Ben Zvi
    Affiliations
    Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (Drs Gutzeit, Justman, Ben Zvi, Siegler, Khatib, Ginsberg, Beloosesky, Weiner, Vitner, Liberman, and Zipori)
    Search for articles by this author
  • Yoav Siegler
    Affiliations
    Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (Drs Gutzeit, Justman, Ben Zvi, Siegler, Khatib, Ginsberg, Beloosesky, Weiner, Vitner, Liberman, and Zipori)
    Search for articles by this author
  • Nizar Khatib
    Affiliations
    Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (Drs Gutzeit, Justman, Ben Zvi, Siegler, Khatib, Ginsberg, Beloosesky, Weiner, Vitner, Liberman, and Zipori)

    Ruth & Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel (Drs Khatib, Ginsberg, Beloosesky, Weiner, Vitner, and Zipori)
    Search for articles by this author
  • Yuval Ginsberg
    Affiliations
    Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (Drs Gutzeit, Justman, Ben Zvi, Siegler, Khatib, Ginsberg, Beloosesky, Weiner, Vitner, Liberman, and Zipori)

    Ruth & Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel (Drs Khatib, Ginsberg, Beloosesky, Weiner, Vitner, and Zipori)
    Search for articles by this author
  • Ron Beloosesky
    Affiliations
    Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (Drs Gutzeit, Justman, Ben Zvi, Siegler, Khatib, Ginsberg, Beloosesky, Weiner, Vitner, Liberman, and Zipori)

    Ruth & Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel (Drs Khatib, Ginsberg, Beloosesky, Weiner, Vitner, and Zipori)
    Search for articles by this author
  • Zeev Weiner
    Affiliations
    Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (Drs Gutzeit, Justman, Ben Zvi, Siegler, Khatib, Ginsberg, Beloosesky, Weiner, Vitner, Liberman, and Zipori)

    Ruth & Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel (Drs Khatib, Ginsberg, Beloosesky, Weiner, Vitner, and Zipori)
    Search for articles by this author
  • Dana Vitner
    Affiliations
    Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (Drs Gutzeit, Justman, Ben Zvi, Siegler, Khatib, Ginsberg, Beloosesky, Weiner, Vitner, Liberman, and Zipori)

    Ruth & Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel (Drs Khatib, Ginsberg, Beloosesky, Weiner, Vitner, and Zipori)
    Search for articles by this author
  • Sapir Liberman
    Affiliations
    Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (Drs Gutzeit, Justman, Ben Zvi, Siegler, Khatib, Ginsberg, Beloosesky, Weiner, Vitner, Liberman, and Zipori)
    Search for articles by this author
  • Yaniv Zipori
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author: Yaniv Zipori, MD.
    Affiliations
    Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (Drs Gutzeit, Justman, Ben Zvi, Siegler, Khatib, Ginsberg, Beloosesky, Weiner, Vitner, Liberman, and Zipori)

    Ruth & Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel (Drs Khatib, Ginsberg, Beloosesky, Weiner, Vitner, and Zipori)
    Search for articles by this author
Published:December 23, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajogmf.2022.100845

      BACKGROUND

      Late preterm neonates born between 34.0 and 36.6 weeks’ gestation are at increased risk for short- and long-term morbidity and mortality when compared with their term counterparts. Currently, no separate labor curve is available for late preterm births, and this group's optimal duration of the second stage of labor has never been defined separately.

      OBJECTIVE

      This study aimed to compare the second stage duration between late preterm and term births.

      STUDY DESIGN

      This was a retrospective study from May 2014 until May 2021. Eligible were women with a singleton pregnancy, vertex presentation, spontaneous or induced onset of labor, and those who delivered vaginally beyond 34.0 weeks of gestation. The primary outcome of our study was to compare and characterize the second stage of labor duration between late preterm and term births.

      RESULTS

      We analyzed 962 late preterm and 9476 term vaginal deliveries. Women who delivered during the late preterm period were more likely to be multiparous (52.4% vs 45.2%; P<.001) and fewer required oxytocin during labor (41.2% vs 54.4%; P<.001) or used epidural analgesia (75.2% vs 83.6%; P<.001). The overall mean duration of the second stage of labor was significantly shorter in the late preterm period than at term (1.08±1.09 hours vs 1.49±1.22 hours; P<.001). This was even more pronounced for nulliparous women (1.05±1.00 hours vs 2.10±1.17 hours; P<.001). Among multiparous women, epidural use significantly affected the duration of the second stage of labor, and the second stage was relatively longer during the late preterm period than at term in this subgroup (1.16 vs 0.5 hours; P<.001). Using a multivariate Cox regression, variables such as maternal age (hazard ratio, 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 1.01–1.04), parity (hazard ratio, 4.11; 95% confidence interval, 3.65–4.63), preterm birth (hazard ratio, 2.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.4–3.10), and birthweight at delivery (hazard ratio, 1.15; 95% confidence interval, 1.01–1.30) shortened the second stage, whereas induction of labor (hazard ratio, 0.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.66–0.86) and epidural use (hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.64–0.86) extended its total duration. Regardless of parity, lower rates of operative vaginal deliveries were observed in the late preterm period than at term (3.7% vs 15.5%; P<.001). This period was also associated with lower rates of third- and fourth-degree perineal lacerations (0.2% vs 2.2%; P<.001) but higher rates of chorioamnionitis (1.7% vs 0.1%; P<.001), Apgar score at 5 minutes <7 (1.0% vs 0.2%; P<.001), and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (19.3% vs 1.0%; P<.001).

      CONCLUSION

      Women who delivered vaginally during the late preterm period had a distinctive second-stage duration. Primarily, it was shown to be significantly shorter for nulliparous and multiparous women. Future studies should further clarify the optimal duration of this stage in relation to neonatal outcomes at such a vulnerable period.

      Key words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Martin JA
        • Hamilton BE
        • Osterman MJK
        • Driscoll AK
        • Drake P.
        Births: final data for 2017.
        Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2018; 67: 1-50
        • Chawanpaiboon S
        • Vogel JP
        • Moller AB
        • et al.
        Global, regional, and national estimates of levels of preterm birth in 2014: a systematic review and modelling analysis.
        Lancet Glob Health. 2019; 7: e37-e46
        • Melamed N
        • Klinger G
        • Tenenbaum-Gavish K
        • et al.
        Short-term neonatal outcome in low-risk, spontaneous, singleton, late preterm deliveries.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 114: 253-260
        • Shah P
        • Kaciroti N
        • Richards B
        • Oh W
        • Lumeng JC.
        Developmental outcomes of late preterm infants from infancy to kindergarten.
        Pediatrics. 2016; 138e20153496
        • Slattery MM
        • Morrison JJ.
        Preterm delivery.
        Lancet. 2002; 360: 1489-1497
        • Areia AL
        • Rodrigues P
        • Alarcão A
        • Ladeirinha A
        • Moura P
        • Carvalho L.
        Is preterm labor influenced by the maternal-fetal interface?.
        Fetal Pediatr Pathol. 2017; 36: 89-105
        • Arenas-Hernandez M
        • Romero R
        • Xu Y
        • et al.
        Effector and activated T cells induce preterm labor and birth that is prevented by treatment with progesterone.
        J Immunol. 2019; 202: 2585-2608
        • Romero R
        • Dey SK
        • Fisher SJ.
        Preterm labor: one syndrome, many causes.
        Science. 2014; 345: 760-765
        • Phung J
        • Wang CA
        • Reeders J
        • et al.
        Preterm labor is a distinct process from term labor following computational analysis of human myometrium.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022; 226 (106.e1–16)
        • Zhang J
        • Landy HJ
        • Ware Branch D
        • et al.
        Contemporary patterns of spontaneous labor with normal neonatal outcomes.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 116: 1281-1287
        • Spong CY
        • Berghella V
        • Wenstrom KD
        • Mercer BM
        • Saade GR.
        Preventing the first cesarean delivery: summary of a joint Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Workshop.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 120: 1181-1193
        • Caughey AB
        • Cahill AG
        • Guise JM
        • Rouse DJ.
        • American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (College), Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine
        Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 210: 179-193
        • Shapiro-Mendoza CK
        • Tomashek KM
        • Kotelchuck M
        • et al.
        Effect of late-preterm birth and maternal medical conditions on newborn morbidity risk.
        Pediatrics. 2008; 121: e223-e232
        • McGowan JE
        • Alderdice FA
        • Holmes VA
        • Johnston L.
        Early childhood development of late-preterm infants: a systematic review.
        Pediatrics. 2011; 127: 1111-1124
        • Teune MJ
        • Bakhuizen S
        • Gyamfi Bannerman C
        • et al.
        A systematic review of severe morbidity in infants born late preterm.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 205 (374.e1–9)
        • Stewart DL
        • Barfield WD
        • COMMITTEE ON FETUS AND NEWBORN
        Updates on an at-risk population: late-preterm and early-term infants.
        Pediatrics. 2019; 144e20192760
        • Higgins RD
        • Saade G
        • Polin RA
        • et al.
        Evaluation and management of women and newborns with a maternal diagnosis of chorioamnionitis: summary of a workshop.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 127: 426-436
        • Kjaergaard H
        • Olsen J
        • Ottesen B
        • Dykes AK.
        Incidence and outcomes of dystocia in the active phase of labor in term nulliparous women with spontaneous labor onset.
        Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009; 88: 402-407
        • Gimovsky AC
        • Guarente J
        • Berghella V.
        Prolonged second stage in nulliparous with epidurals: a systematic review.
        J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017; 30: 461-465
        • Schulman H
        • Romney SL.
        Variability of uterine contractions in normal human parturition.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1970; 36: 215-221
        • Hauth JC
        • Hankins GD
        • Gilstrap 3rd, LC
        • Strickland DM
        • Vance P.
        Uterine contraction pressures with oxytocin induction/augmentation.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1986; 68: 305-309
        • Steer PJ.
        Improving our understanding of uterine activity during labour.
        BJOG. 2022; 129: 985
        • Janakiraman V
        • Ecker J
        • Kaimal AJ.
        Comparing the second stage in induced and spontaneous labor.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 116: 606-611
        • Grobman WA
        • Sandoval G
        • Reddy UM
        • et al.
        Health resource utilization of labor induction versus expectant management.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 222 (369.e1–11)
        • Cheng YW
        • Shaffer BL
        • Nicholson JM
        • Caughey AB.
        Second stage of labor and epidural use: a larger effect than previously suggested.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 123: 527-535
        • Wang TT
        • Sun S
        • Huang SQ.
        Effects of epidural labor analgesia with low concentrations of local anesthetics on obstetric outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
        Anesth Analg. 2017; 124: 1571-1580
        • Anim-Somuah M
        • Smyth RM
        • Cyna AM
        • Cuthbert A.
        Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia for pain management in labour.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018; 5CD000331
        • Åberg K
        • Norman M
        • Ekéus C.
        Preterm birth by vacuum extraction and neonatal outcome: a population-based cohort study.
        BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014; 14: 42
        • Jha S
        • Parker V.
        Risk factors for recurrent obstetric anal sphincter injury (rOASI): a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Int Urogynecol J. 2016; 27: 849-857
        • Murphy S
        • O'Leary B
        • Ciprike V
        Obstetric anal sphincter injury associated with preterm delivery.
        Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020; 255: 266-267
        • Kim CJ
        • Romero R
        • Chaemsaithong P
        • Chaiyasit N
        • Yoon BH
        • Kim YM.
        Acute chorioamnionitis and funisitis: definition, pathologic features, and clinical significance.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 213: S29-S52
        • Romero R
        • Shamma F
        • Avila C
        • et al.
        Infection and labor. VI. Prevalence, microbiology, and clinical significance of intraamniotic infection in twin gestations with preterm labor.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990; 163: 757-761
        • Blackwell S
        • Romero R
        • Chaiworapongsa T
        • et al.
        Maternal and fetal inflammatory responses in unexplained fetal death.
        J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2003; 14: 151-157
        • DiGiulio DB
        • Gervasi M
        • Romero R
        • et al.
        Microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity in preeclampsia as assessed by cultivation and sequence-based methods.
        J Perinat Med. 2010; 38: 503-513
        • Cheng YW
        • Hopkins LM
        • Laros Jr, RK
        • Caughey AB.
        Duration of the second stage of labor in multiparous women: maternal and neonatal outcomes.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 196 (585.e1–6)
        • Laughon SK
        • Berghella V
        • Reddy UM
        • Sundaram R
        • Lu Z
        • Hoffman MK.
        Neonatal and maternal outcomes with prolonged second stage of labor.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 124: 57-67
        • Zipori Y
        • Grunwald O
        • Ginsberg Y
        • Beloosesky R
        • Weiner Z.
        The impact of extending the second stage of labor to prevent primary cesarean delivery on maternal and neonatal outcomes.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 220 (191.e1–7)