BACKGROUND
OBJECTIVE
STUDY DESIGN
RESULTS
CONCLUSION
Keywords
Why was this study conducted?
Key findings
What does this add to what is known?
Introduction
- Roofthooft E
- Joshi GP
- Rawal N
- Van de Velde M
Materials and Methods
Study design and population
Randomization and blinding
Interventions
Outcome measures
Statistical analysis
Results
Patients and baseline characteristics

Characteristic | Group | F value | P value | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCIA + sham EA group (n=52) | PCIA + 2-Hz EA group (n=53) | PCIA + 20/100–Hz EA group (n=53) | |||
Age (y) | 31.19±3.37 | 30.83±3.59 | 30.13±3.31 | 1.30 | .28 |
Height (cm) | 159.44±5.51 | 159.87±4.86 | 159.70±5.38 | .09 | .92 |
Weight (kg) | 67.80±9.38 | 69.37±9.11 | 71.15±11.37 | 1.47 | .23 |
BMI (kg/m2) | 26.65±3.22 | 27.16±3.47 | 27.82±3.54 | 1.56 | .21 |
Gestational (wk) | 38.19±1.28 | 37.96±1.64 | 38.32±1.45 | .82 | .44 |
Primary outcome
Comparison among groups | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCIA + sham EA vs PCIA + 2-Hz EA | PCIA + sham EA vs PCIA + 20/100–Hz EA | PCIA + 2-Hz EA vs PCIA + 20/100–Hz EA | |||||||||
Outcomes | PCIA + sham EA group (n=52) | PCIA + 2-Hz EA group (n=53) | PCIA + 20/100–Hz EA group (n=53) | Statistic | P value | Difference (95% CI) | P value | Difference (95% CI) | P value | Difference (95% CI) | P value |
6 h after surgery | 1.0 (0.0–2.8) | 0.0 (0.0–0.0) | 0.0 (0.0–1.0) | 25.49 | <.001 | 1.50 (0.73–2.29) | <.001 | 1.20 (0.44–1.97) | .001 | −0.30 (−0.78 to 0.18) | .076 |
12 h after surgery | 3.0 (1.0–6.8) | 0.0 (0.0–1.0) | 0.0 (0.0–1.0) | 40.37 | <.001 | 3.58 (2.28–4.87) | <.001 | 3.48 (2.21–4.75) | <.001 | −0.09 (−0.78 to 0.59) | .535 |
24 h after surgery | 5.5 (3.0–10.0) | 0.0 (0.0–2.0) | 0.0 (0.0–2.0) | 64.50 | <.001 | 5.72 (4.10–7.34) | <.001 | 5.57 (3.98–7.15) | <.001 | −0.15 (−1.09 to 0.78) | .492 |
48 h after surgery | 9.0 (4.3–12.0) | 1.0 (0.0–3.0) | 1.0 (0.0–4.5) | 63.68 | <.001 | 7.91 (5.81–10.00) | <.001 | 7.04 (4.84–9.24) | <.001 | −0.87 (−2.27 to 0.54) | .175 |
Secondary outcomes
Comparison among groups | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCIA + sham EA vs PCIA + 2-Hz EA | PCIA + sham EA vs PCIA + 20/100–Hz EA | PCIA + 2-Hz EA vs PCIA + 20/100–Hz EA | |||||||||
Outcomes | PCIA + sham EA group (n=52) | PCIA + 2-Hz EA group (n=53) | PCIA + 20/100–Hz EA group (n=53) | Statistic | P value | Difference (95% CI) | P value | Difference (95% CI) | P value | Difference (95% CI) | P value |
Pain score 6, 12, 24, and 48 h after surgery, mean±SDb | |||||||||||
6 h after surgery | 7.23±1.13 | 7.17±1.21 | 6.87±1.32 | 1.34 | .266 | 0.06 (−0.41 to 0.53) | .798 | 0.36 (−0.11 to 0.83) | .130 | 0.30 (−0.17 to 0.77) | .205 |
12 h after surgery | 4.71±0.92 | 2.62±0.84 | 2.42±0.77 | 118.98 | <.001 | 2.09 (1.76–2.41) | <.001 | 2.30 (1.97–2.62) | <.001 | 0.21 (−0.12 to 0.53) | .207 |
24 h after surgery | 3.54±0.75 | 1.15±0.69 | 1.15±0.69 | 196.31 | <.001 | 2.39 (2.11–2.66) | <.001 | 2.39 (2.11–2.66) | <.001 | 0.00 (−0.27 to 0.27) | 1.000 |
48 h after surgery | 2.48±0.67 | 0.62±0.48 | 0.58±0.49 | 197.27 | <.001 | 1.86 (1.64–2.07) | <.001 | 1.90 (1.68–2.11) | <.001 | 0.04 (−0.18 to 0.25) | .728 |
Fentanyl consumption 6, 12, 24, and 48 h after surgery, mean±SDb | |||||||||||
6 h after surgery (mL) | 14.61±6.55 | 10.16±5.21 | 11.49±4.21 | 9.37 | <.001 | 4.45 (2.37–6.53) | <.001 | 3.12 (1.04–5.20) | .004 | −1.33 (−3.40 to 0.74) | .207 |
12 h after surgery (mL) | 30.29±10.47 | 20.32±8.69 | 22.09±8.32 | 17.50 | <.001 | 9.97 (6.42–13.52) | <.001 | 8.20 (4.65–11.75) | <.001 | −1.77 (−5.30 to 1.76) | .324 |
24 h after surgery (mL) | 56.54±12.50 | 39.31±15.58 | 45.72±16.92 | 17.38 | <.001 | 17.24 (11.40–23.07) | <.001 | 10.83 (5.00–16.66) | .001 | −6.41 (−12.21 to 0.61) | .031 |
48 h after surgery (mL) | 94.88±9.91 | 82.41±21.18 | 83.76±17.91 | 8.45 | <.001 | 12.47 (5.90–19.04) | <.001 | 11.12 (4.55–17.69) | .001 | −1.35 (−7.89 to 5.19) | .684 |
The time of the first exhaust after surgery, mean±SDb | |||||||||||
The first exhaust after surgery (h) | 32.19±12.93 | 30.77±13.10 | 29.88±14.07 | .40 | .675 | 1.41 (−3.75 to 6.58) | .589 | 2.30 (−2.86 to 7.46) | .380 | 1.41 (−3.75 to 6.57) | .589 |

Index | Outcomes | PCIA + sham EA group (n=52) | PCIA + 2-Hz EA group (n=53) | PCIA + 20/100–Hz EA group (n=53) | Statistic | P value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IL-6 content | 12 h after surgery | 60.69 (48.96–80.24) | 68.41 (49.42–83.52) | 58.18 (44.70–86.04) | 1.07 | .587 |
48 h after surgery | 17.19 (12.65–23.90) | 15.92 (9.84–20.05) | 15.16 (12.61–21.90) | 3.21 | .201 | |
Z value | −6.21 | −6.33 | −6.31 | |||
P value | <.001 | <.001 | <.001 | |||
PCT content | 12 h after surgery | 0.11 (0.08–0.18) | 0.11 (0.08–0.17) | 0.11 (0.08–0.18) | 0.48 | .201 |
48 h after surgery | 0.08 (0.06–0.13) | 0.09 (0.05–0.20) | 0.07 (0.05–0.12) | 2.75 | .253 | |
Z value | −3.25 | −1.26 | −4.08 | |||
P value | .001 | .208 | <.001 |
Safety
Discussion
Principal findings
Results and clinical implications
Research implications
Strengths and limitations
Blinding
Conclusions
Appendix. Supplementary materials
References
- Pain management video reduces opioid use after cesarean delivery.JAMA. 2021; 326: 1139
- Increased postpartum maternal complications after cesarean section compared with vaginal delivery in 225 304 Taiwanese women.J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016; 29: 1665-1672
- Predicting severity of acute pain after cesarean delivery: a narrative review.Anesth Analg. 2018; 126: 1606-1614
- A comparison of acute pain management strategies after cesarean delivery.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022; 226 (407.e1–7)
- Risk factors for persistent pain and its influence on maternal wellbeing after cesarean section.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015; 94: 622-628
- The current consideration, approach, and management in postcesarean delivery pain control: a narrative review.Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2021; 20212156918
- PROSPECT Working Group* of the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy and supported by the Obstetric Anaesthetists’ Association. PROSPECT guideline for elective caesarean section: updated systematic review and procedure-specific postoperative pain management recommendations.Anaesthesia. 2021; 76: 665-680
- Effect of low-dose esketamine on pain control and postpartum depression after cesarean section: a retrospective cohort study.Ann Palliat Med. 2022; 11: 45-57
- Acute postoperative pain is correlated with the early onset of postpartum depression after cesarean section: a retrospective cohort study.J Anesth. 2020; 34: 607-612
- Analgesia after cesarean delivery in the United States 2008-2018: a retrospective cohort study.Anesth Analg. 2021; 133: 1550-1558
- Impact of a multimodal analgesic protocol modification on opioid consumption after cesarean delivery: a retrospective cohort study.J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022; 35: 4743-4749
- A patient-controlled intravenous analgesia with tramadol ameliorates postpartum depression in high-risk woman after cesarean section: a randomized controlled trial.Front Med (Lausanne). 2021; 8679159
- Influence of psychostimulants and opioids on epigenetic modification of class III histone deacetylase (HDAC)-sirtuins in glial cells.Sci Rep. 2021; 11: 21335
- Suppression of neuropathic pain by selective silencing of dorsal root ganglion ectopia using nonblocking concentrations of lidocaine.Pain. 2019; 160: 2105-2114
- Characterization of peripheral and central sensitization after dorsal root ganglion intervention in patients with unilateral lumbosacral radicular pain: a prospective pilot study.Br J Anaesth. 2017; 118: 924-931
- The dose response of sufentanil as an adjuvant to ropivacaine in cesarean section for relief from somato-visceral pain under epidural anesthesia in parturients with scarred uterus.Medicine (Baltimore). 2018; 97: e12404
- Intravenous remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia versus intramuscular pethidine for pain relief in labour (RESPITE): an open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial.Lancet. 2018; 392: 662-672
- Individual vs. group delivery of acupuncture therapy for chronic musculoskeletal pain in urban primary care-a randomized trial.J Gen Intern Med. 2020; 35: 1227-1237
- Acupuncture for chronic pain in adults with sickle cell disease: a mixed-methods pilot study.Acupunct Med. 2021; 39: 612-618
- Acupuncture alleviates chronic pain and comorbid conditions in a mouse model of neuropathic pain: the involvement of DNA methylation in the prefrontal cortex.Pain. 2021; 162: 514-530
- Acupuncture and postoperative pain reduction.Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2022; 26: 453-458
- A combination of electroacupuncture and auricular acupuncture for postoperative pain after abdominal surgery for gynaecological diseases: a randomized controlled trial.Phytomedicine. 2022; 104154292
- Acupuncture or acupressure for pain management during labour.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020; 2CD009232
- Acupuncture for pain control after caesarean section: a prospective observational pilot study.Acupunct Med. 2016; 34: 14-19
- Multicentre randomised controlled clinical trial of electroacupuncture with usual care for patients with non-acute pain after back surgery.Br J Anaesth. 2021; 126: 692-699
- Effectiveness of acupuncture for pain control after cesarean delivery: a randomized clinical trial.JAMA Netw Open. 2022; 5e220517
- Postoperative pain therapy with laser acupuncture after cesarean section under spinal anesthesia: a double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.Complement Med Res. 2022; 29: 235-241
- STRICTA (STandards for Reporting Interventions in Clinical Trials of Acupuncture).in: Moher D Altman DG Schulz KF Simera I Wager E Guidelines for reporting health research: a user's manual. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester, United Kingdom2014
- Comparison of postoperative pain between patients who underwent primary and repeated cesarean section: a prospective cohort study.BMC Anesthesiol. 2019; 19: 189
- Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia for pain management in labour.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018; 5CD000331
- Acupuncture for pain management: molecular mechanisms of action.Am J Chin Med. 2020; 48: 793-811
- Effect of electro-acupuncture (EA) and manual acupuncture (MA) on markers of inflammation in knee osteoarthritis.J Pain Res. 2020; 13: 2171-2179
- Electroacupuncture suppresses glucose metabolism and GLUT-3 expression in medial prefrontal cortical in rats with neuropathic pain.Biol Res. 2021; 54: 24
- Acupuncture alleviates menstrual pain in rat model via suppressing eotaxin/CCR3 axis to weak EOS-MC activation.Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022; 20224571981
- Effect of electro-acupuncture at ST36 and SP6 on the cAMP -CREB pathway and mRNA expression profile in the brainstem of morphine tolerant mice.Front Neurosci. 2021; 15698967
- Effectiveness of acupuncture for recovery of flatulence after cesarean section: a case report.Medicine (Baltimore). 2018; 97: e13352
- [Effect of electroacupuncture on pain threshold and expression of pain-related factors cyclooxygenase-2, prostaglandin E2 and β-endorphin in rats with chronic pelvic pain syndrome].Zhen Ci Yan Jiu. 2022; 47: 531-536
- Low frequency electroacupuncture alleviates neuropathic pain by activation of spinal microglial IL-10/β-endorphin pathway.Biomed Pharmacother. 2020; 125109898
- Effects of acupuncture and moxibustion combined with needle-knife on pain and lumbar function in patients with lumbar disc herniation.J Healthc Eng. 2022; 20229185384
- Maternal and umbilical cord procalcitonin, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, and interleukin-6 levels in preeclamptic and normotensive patients: a cross-sectional study.Pregnancy Hypertens. 2020; 21: 218-223
- Diagnostic efficacy of serum procalcitonin, IL-6, IL-2, and D-dimer levels in an experimental acute appendicitis model.Turk J Gastroenterol. 2019; 30: 641-647
- Inflammatory biomarkers and clinical judgment in the emergency diagnosis of urgent abdominal pain.Clin Chem. 2019; 65: 302-312
- Postoperative subcutaneous instillation of low-dose ketorolac but not hydromorphone reduces wound exudate concentrations of interleukin-6 and interleukin-10 and improves analgesia following cesarean delivery.J Pain. 2013; 14: 48-56
- Efficacy of acupuncture on pain mechanisms, inflammatory responses, and wound healing in the acute phase of major burns: an experimental study on rats.J Burn Care Res. 2022; 43: 389-398
Article info
Publication history
Footnotes
The authors report no conflict of interest.
This study was funded by Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (grant number LQ21H270008 and LY19H040014), Youth Innovative Talents Support Program of Zhejiang Medical and Health Science and Technology Program (grant number 2022492789), and Key Laboratory of Pulsed Power Translational Medicine of Zhejiang Province (grant number ZMY-KF-210002). The funding source had no involvement in this research.
This study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT04879212).
Cite this article as: Jin Y, Yu X, Hu S, et al. Efficacy of electroacupuncture combined with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia after cesarean delivery: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM 2022;XX:x.ex–x.ex.
Identification
Copyright
User license
Creative Commons Attribution – NonCommercial – NoDerivs (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) |
Permitted
For non-commercial purposes:
- Read, print & download
- Redistribute or republish the final article
- Text & data mine
- Translate the article (private use only, not for distribution)
- Reuse portions or extracts from the article in other works
Not Permitted
- Sell or re-use for commercial purposes
- Distribute translations or adaptations of the article
Elsevier's open access license policy