Advertisement

Maternal–fetal medicine fellowship program director perspective on virtual interviews following matriculation of the first virtual interview class

      BACKGROUND

      The first class of virtually interviewed maternal–fetal medicine fellows has matriculated into their training programs.

      OBJECTIVE

      This study aimed to evaluate the impact of virtual interviews on the outcomes of the National Resident Matching Program within our subspecialty. We assessed maternal–fetal medicine fellowship program directors’ experience with their fellows who interviewed virtually as compared with experience with the previous year's fellows who interviewed in-person. In addition, we evaluated program directors’ satisfaction with the virtual interview process and their preferred mode of interviewing for future cycles.

      STUDY DESIGN

      A cross-sectional online survey was distributed through the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine to all maternal–fetal medicine fellowship program directors on October 26, 2021, approximately 4 months after the first virtually interviewed fellow matriculated into the training program. Program directors were asked to provide information about their National Resident Matching Program rank list between their final in-person and first virtual years. Program directors were asked to evaluate their experience with their fellow 4 months into the first year of fellowship compared with their expectations based on their virtual interview, and their experience at that same point in fellowship of their last fellow who interviewed in-person. For all questions, in programs with >1 fellow per year, program directors were asked to answer the questions for the fellow ranked highest on their National Resident Matching Program rank list for each year. Survey data were collected anonymously and stored securely. Descriptive statistics and bivariate analyses were performed to compare groups, all tests were 2-sided, and the significance level was set at P<.05.

      RESULTS

      A total of 80 of 98 (81.6%) program directors responded. There was no difference in the position of the matched fellow on the program's National Resident Matching Program rank list between candidates interviewed in-person and candidates interviewed virtually. There was also no difference in the number of programs that took an internal or external candidate outside of the National Resident Matching Program match process or that did not fill their fellowship positions. Program directors reported no difference between fellows interviewed virtually and those interviewed in-person in meeting interview-based performance expectations with regard to clinical capabilities (P=.67), technical skills (P=.96), research potential or experience (P=.54), professionalism and ability to be a team player (P=.72), and compatibility with the division and fellowship program (P=.67). Program directors’ overall experience with virtual interviews was favorable: 70 (95.8%) program directors reported that the virtual interview experience was better than expected, slightly better than expected, or as expected. In future years, most program directors favored ongoing exclusively virtual interviewing (n=41; 56.2%) or a hybrid of virtual and in-person interviews (n=27; 37.0%). Only 5 (6.9%) reported a desire to return to exclusively in-person interviewing.

      CONCLUSION

      Maternal–fetal medicine fellowship program directors did not identify a difference in National Resident Matching Program results between fellows interviewed virtually and those interviewed in-person. Furthermore, there was no difference between these fellows in meeting interview-based expectations in the first year of the training program. Most program directors found the virtual interview process to be effective and support ongoing virtual interviews.

      Key words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

      1. Association of American Medical Colleges. “Conducting interviews during the coronavirus pandemic.” 2021. Available at:https://www.aamc.org/what-we-do/mission-areas/medical-education/conducting-interviews-during-coronavirus-pandemic Accessed May 9, 2022.

        • Lewkowitz AK
        • Ramsey PS
        • Burrell D
        • Metz TD
        • Rhoades JS.
        Effect of virtual interviewing on applicant approach to and perspective of the Maternal-Fetal Medicine Subspecialty Fellowship Match.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2021; 3100326
        • Rhoades JS
        • Ramsey PS
        • Metz TD
        • Lewkowitz AK.
        Maternal-fetal medicine program director experience of exclusive virtual interviewing during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2021; 3100344
      2. National Resident Matching Program. Explaining COVID's impact on the 2020–21 virtual recruitment season and NRMP match outcomes. 2021. Available at:https://thalamusgme.com/explaining-covids-impact-on-the-2020-2021-medical-residency-recruitment-season-and-nrmp-match-outcomes/. Accessed May 9, 2022.

      3. National Resident Matching Program. Coalition for physicians accountability releases recommendations on 2021–22 residency season interviewing. 2021. Available at:https://www.nrmp.org/about/news/2021/08/coalition-for-physician-accountability-releases-recommendations-on-2021-22-residency-season-interviewing/. Accessed May 9, 2022.

        • Menhaji K
        • Gaigbe-Togbe BH
        • Hardart A
        • et al.
        Virtual interviews During COVID-19: perspectives of female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery program directors.
        Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2021; 27: 575-580
        • Lewit R
        • Gosain A.
        Virtual interviews may fall short for pediatric surgery fellowships: lessons learned from COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2.
        J Surg Res. 2021; 259: 326-331
        • Vining CC
        • Eng OS
        • Hogg ME
        • et al.
        Virtual surgical fellowship recruitment during COVID-19 and its implications for resident/fellow recruitment in the future.
        Ann Surg Oncol. 2020; 27: 911-915
        • Ponterio JM
        • Keslar M
        • Lakhi NA.
        The virtual interview format for fellowship recruitment in obstetrics and gynecology: a nationwide survey of program directors.
        Med Educ Online. 2022; 272054304
        • Peyser A
        • Gulersen M
        • Nimaroff M
        • Mullin C
        • Goldman RH.
        Virtual obstetrics and gynecology fellowship interviews during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic: a survey study.
        BMC Med Educ. 2021; 21: 449