Advertisement
Original Research| Volume 4, ISSUE 5, 100689, September 2022

Nurse workforce diversity and reduced risk of severe adverse maternal outcomes

      BACKGROUND

      Racial and ethnic diversification of the physician and nurse workforce is recommended as a leverage point to address the impact of structural racism in maternal care, but empirical evidence supporting this recommendation is currently lacking.

      OBJECTIVE

      This study aimed to assess the association between state-level registered nurse workforce racial and ethnic diversity and severe adverse maternal outcomes during childbirth.

      STUDY DESIGN

      This population-based cross-sectional study analyzed 2017 US birth certificate data. Severe adverse maternal outcomes included eclampsia, blood transfusion, hysterectomy, or intensive care unit admission. Proportions of minoritized racial and ethnic registered nurses in each state were abstracted from the American Community Survey (5-year estimate, 2013–2017). This proportion was categorized into 3 terciles, with the first tercile corresponding to the lowest proportion and the third tercile corresponding to the highest proportion. Crude and adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals of severe adverse maternal outcomes associated with terciles of the state proportion of minoritized racial and ethnic nurses were estimated using logistic regression models.

      RESULTS

      Of the 3,668,813 birth certificates studied, 29,174 recorded severe adverse maternal outcomes (79.5 per 10,000; 95% confidence interval, 78.6–80.4). The mean state proportion of minoritized racial and ethnic nurses was 22.1%, ranging from 3.3% in Maine to 68.2% in Hawaii. For White mothers, the incidence of severe adverse outcomes was 85.3 per 10,000 for those who gave births in states in the first tercile of the proportion of minoritized racial and ethnic nurses and 53.9 per 10,000 for those who gave birth in states in the third tercile (risk difference, −31.4 per 10,000; 95% confidence interval, −34.4 to −28.5). It corresponds to a 37% decreased risk of severe adverse maternal outcomes associated with giving birth in a state in the third tercile (crude odds ratio, 0.63; 95% confidence interval, 0.60–0.66). A decreased risk of severe adverse maternal outcomes was observed for Black mothers (crude odds ratio, 0.65; 95% confidence interval, 0.61–0.70), Hispanic mothers (crude odds ratio, 0.51; 95% confidence interval, 0.48–0.54), and Asian and Pacific Islander mothers (crude odds ratio, 0.65; 95% confidence interval, 0.58–0.72) but not for Native American mothers (crude odds ratio, 0.89; 95% confidence interval, 0.72–1.09) or mothers with >1 race (crude odds ratio, 1.44; 95% confidence interval, 0.72–1.09). After adjustment for patients and hospital characteristics, giving birth in states in the third tercile was associated with a reduced risk of severe adverse outcomes as follows: 32% for White mothers (adjusted odds ratio, 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.59–0.77), 20% for Black mothers (adjusted odds ratio, 0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.65–0.99), 31% for Hispanic mothers (adjusted odds ratio, 0.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.58–0.82), and 50% for Asian and Pacific Islander mothers (adjusted odds ratio, 0.50; 95% confidence interval, 0.38–0.65). The associations of the proportion of minoritized racial and ethnic nurses with the risk of severe adverse maternal outcomes were not statistically significant for Native American mothers and more than 1 race mothers. Results were similar when blood transfusion was excluded from the outcome measure.

      CONCLUSION

      A diverse state registered nurse workforce was associated with a reduced risk of severe adverse maternal outcomes during childbirth.

      Key words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

      1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The Surgeon General's call to action to improve maternal health. Available at:https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/call-to-action-maternal-health.pdf. Accessed March 18, 2022.

      2. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy women, healthy pregnancies, healthy futures: action plan to improve maternal health in America. Available at:https://aspe.hhs.gov/system/files/aspe-files/264076/healthy-women-healthy-pregnancies-healthy-future-action-plan_0.pdf. Accessed March 18, 2022.

        • Guglielminotti J
        • Wong CA
        • Friedman AM
        • Li G.
        Racial and ethnic disparities in death associated with severe maternal morbidity in the United States: failure to rescue.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2021; 137: 791-800
        • Admon LK
        • Winkelman TNA
        • Zivin K
        • Terplan M
        • Mhyre JM
        • Dalton VK.
        Racial and ethnic disparities in the incidence of severe maternal morbidity in the United States, 2012-2015.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 132: 1158-1166
        • Kozhimannil KB
        • Interrante JD
        • Tofte AN
        • Admon LK.
        Severe maternal morbidity and mortality among indigenous women in the United States.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 135: 294-300
        • Taylor JK.
        Structural racism and maternal health among Black women.
        J Law Med Ethics. 2020; 48: 506-517
        • Crear-Perry J
        • Correa-De-Araujo R
        • Lewis Johnson T
        • Mclemore MR
        • Neilson E
        • Wallace M
        Social and structural determinants of health inequities in maternal health.
        J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2021; 30: 230-235
        • Janevic T
        • Zeitlin J
        • Egorova N
        • Hebert PL
        • Balbierz A
        • Howell EA.
        Neighborhood racial and economic polarization, hospital of delivery, and severe maternal morbidity.
        Health Aff (Millwood). 2020; 39: 768-776
        • Liu SY
        • Fiorentini C
        • Bailey Z
        • Huynh M
        • Mcveigh K
        • Kaplan D.
        Structural racism and severe maternal morbidity in New York State.
        Clin Med Insights Womens Health. 2019; 12 (1179562X19854778)
        • Yearby R.
        Structural racism and health disparities: reconfiguring the social determinants of health framework to include the root cause.
        J Law Med Ethics. 2020; 48: 518-526
        • Bailey ZD
        • Feldman JM
        • Bassett MT.
        How structural racism works - racist policies as a root cause of U.S. racial health inequities.
        N Engl J Med. 2021; 384: 768-773
        • Bailey ZD
        • Krieger N
        • Agénor M
        • Graves J
        • Linos N
        • Bassett MT.
        Structural racism and health inequities in the USA: evidence and interventions.
        Lancet. 2017; 389: 1453-1463
        • Yearby R
        • Clark B
        • Figueroa JF.
        Structural racism in historical and modern US health care policy.
        Health Aff (Millwood). 2022; 41: 187-194
        • Gillispie-Bell V.
        The contrast of color: why the Black community continues to suffer health disparities.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2021; 137: 220-224
        • Howell EA
        • Brown H
        • Brumley J
        • et al.
        Reduction of peripartum racial and ethnic disparities: a conceptual framework and maternal safety consensus bundle.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 131: 770-782
        • Mhyre JM
        • D'oria R
        • Hameed AB
        • et al.
        The maternal early warning criteria: a proposal from the National Partnership for Maternal Safety.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 124: 782-786
      3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. U.S. standard certificate of live birth. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/birth11-03final-ACC.pdf. Accessed March 18, 2022.

      4. Health Resources and Services Administration. Area Health Resources Files (AHRF). data.HRSA.gov. Available at: https://data.hrsa.gov/topics/health-workforce/ahrf. Accessed March 18, 2022.

        • Luke B
        • Brown MB
        • Liu CL
        • Diop H
        • Stern JE.
        Validation of severe maternal morbidity on the US certificate of live birth.
        Epidemiology. 2018; 29: e31-e32
      5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. How does CDC identify severe maternal morbidity? 2019. Available at:https://www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/maternalinfanthealth/smm/severe-morbidity-ICD.htm. Accessed March 18, 2022.

      6. Kaiser Family Foundation. Medicaid and CHIP Income eligibility limits for pregnant women. Available at:https://www.kff.org/medicaid/state-indicator/medicaid-and-chip-income-eligibility-limits-for-pregnant-women/?currentTimeframe=0&sortModel=%7B%22colId%22:%22Location%22,%22sort%22:%22asc%22%7D. Accessed March 18, 2022.

      7. R Core Team. The R Project for Statistical Computing. Available at: https://www.R-project.org/. Accessed March 18, 2022.

        • Austin PC.
        Using the standardized difference to compare the prevalence of a binary variable between two groups in observational research.
        Commun Stat Simul Comput. 2009; 38: 1228-1234
        • Chapman EN
        • Kaatz A
        • Carnes M.
        Physicians and implicit bias: how doctors may unwittingly perpetuate health care disparities.
        J Gen Intern Med. 2013; 28: 1504-1510
        • Hall WJ
        • Chapman MV
        • Lee KM
        • et al.
        Implicit racial/ethnic bias among health care professionals and its influence on health care outcomes: a systematic review.
        Am J Public Health. 2015; 105: e60-e76
        • Hoffman KM
        • Trawalter S
        • Axt JR
        • Oliver MN.
        Racial bias in pain assessment and treatment recommendations, and false beliefs about biological differences between blacks and whites.
        Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016; 113: 4296-4301
        • Cooper-Patrick L
        • Gallo JJ
        • Gonzales JJ
        • et al.
        Race, gender, and partnership in the patient-physician relationship.
        JAMA. 1999; 282: 583-589
        • Saha S
        • Arbelaez JJ
        • Cooper LA.
        Patient-physician relationships and racial disparities in the quality of health care.
        Am J Public Health. 2003; 93: 1713-1719
        • Takeshita J
        • Wang S
        • Loren AW
        • et al.
        Association of racial/ethnic and gender concordance between patients and physicians with patient experience ratings.
        JAMA Netw Open. 2020; 3e2024583
        • Jetty A
        • Jabbarpour Y
        • Pollack J
        • Huerto R
        • Woo S
        • Petterson S.
        Patient-physician racial concordance associated with improved healthcare use and lower healthcare expenditures in minority populations.
        J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2022; 9: 68-81
        • Greenwood BN
        • Hardeman RR
        • Huang L
        • Sojourner A.
        Physician-patient racial concordance and disparities in birthing mortality for newborns.
        Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020; 117: 21194-21200
        • Ly DP
        • Jena AB.
        Trends in diversity and representativeness of health care workers in the United States, 2000 to 2019.
        JAMA Netw Open. 2021; 4e2117086
        • Building U.S.
        Capacity to Review and Prevent Maternal Deaths. Report from nine maternal mortality review committee.
        Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2018 (Available at:) (Accessed March 18, 2022)
        • Lash TL.
        Bias analysis.
        in: Lash TL VanderWeele TJ Haneuse S Rothman KJ Modern epidemiology. Wolters Kluwer, Philadelphia, PA2021